Food or Supplements
Quite often, we are accused of valuing supplements over whole food sources or even “fear mongering.” After all- for every nutrient, there is a whole food that provides it.
When possible, nutrient needs should absolutely be met using whole foods.
Not every compound in food has been discovered. Most people when formulating a diet would never choose a supplement when a whole, appropriate food is available for each specific dog. It seems there are two extremes. One camp says that because there is no evidence that fresh homemade food is better, then fresh food is not advantageous. On the other end of the spectrum, many
Nutrition science is actually relatively new. The 1910s to the 1950s was the era of vitamin discovery and isolation. This was critical for the prevention of single nutrient deficiency diseases. This time coincided with the Great Depression. Further emphasis was placed upon preventing deficiency diseases. Nutrient requirements were constructed largely because of the war in the US. The 1950s began to see a sharp decline in calorie malnutrition and specific vitamin deficiencies (primarily in high-income countries). Between these time periods, many (inhumane) studies were conducted on animals- including dogs and cats. The 1970s saw an acceleration of economic development and the modernization of agriculture (and not all were good). Single nutrient deficiency diseases declined globally as more foods were fortified (which serves a purpose- but again is not always good). While deficiencies fell, other diseases began to increase. Cancers, type 2 diabetes, and obesity to name a few. Note: This is not implying that chronic disease is always diet related. Unfortunately, studies were only focused on nutrients, and we went on to learn that there is much more beyond nutrients. However, the discovery and utilization of nutrients aided serious conditions- including night blindness (Vitamin A). The 1990s onward saw more large-scale nutrition studies that expanded beyond singular nutrients. Observing diets as a whole became relevant. The Mediterranean Diet is one of the more well-known topics of study. As time progresses, the field of nutrition science has seen that singular nutrients alone are not even scratching the surface of what foods can offer us and animals. Low-fat diets that were supported starting in the ’50s began to be questioned and challenged (like science does). Nutrition science has learned that fat is important- but the type of fat is just as critical. It is certainly emerging how complex foods are beyond metrics like total fat, saturated fat, and energy density. Globally, concerns have grown about the over supplementation of vitamins.
The future of nutrition science includes factors such as nutrigenomics, prebiotics, probiotics, gut microbiota, and plant compounds- to name a few. Conditions like obesity are being re-evaluated- “energy in energy out” is being regarded as too simple. “Recognition of complexity is a key lesson of the past. This is common in scientific progress whether in nutrition, clinical medicine, physics, political science, or economics: initial observations lead to reasonable, simplified theories that achieve certain practical benefits, which are then inevitably advanced by new knowledge and recognition of ever-increasing complexity.”
Does this mean that we disregard nutrient requirements? Certainly not! Nutrition science in its infancy proved that individual nutrients are important. However, nutrition science has become more complex- certainly a good thing! Dogs eating homemade diets are not typically eating fortified food items, so the comparison of their dietary needs to many humans is silly (for more than one reason). Meeting nutrient requirements with foods requires the individual to understand and appreciate the function of nutrients separately, and as a whole. Understanding nutrients
A nice middle ground that seems to be quite rare.
Source: BMJ 2018;361:k2392